Introduction to Environmental Health and Risk Assessment Essay

Asbestos is considered a Public wellness hazard. As such there have been a number of scientific mea reals adopted to manage this try to environmental health and trenchantty. In this word the author would advance that the best way to manage asbestos is by applying the asbestos sound out designed for that particular location. It is believed to be safe since it is a code which has been researched precedent to its design and many of the major insecurity factors were considered.It follows distinct guides such as settlement/ removal (most preferred) isolation/enclosure/sealing engineering controls safe turn practices (administrative controls) personal protective equipment (PPE) (Asbestos control measures, 2010). As it pertains to this project the fortune management plan to be adopted is the elimination and removal pickax which would be discussed in more detail. Justification for the decision In order to ripeify why it is believed that the elimination and removal excerpt is th e best chthonian any circumstances to mange asbestos risks ,the reader must understand what it in reality does. firstly the removal has to be conducted by a certified environmentalist who is conditioned in the practice and would conduct the process according to the environmental heathland and guard duty code pertaining to that procedure. Therefore, it excludes the infiltration of a novice undertaking the risk management technique. Asbestos is a very serious environmental hazard as such any attempts at control must be scientifically monitored.As was previously mentioned these are scientific interventions which are implemented subsequently decades of well evaluated research, environmental entropy, community health concerns and health outcome data. nvironmental data are reviewed to agree whether people in the community power be exposed to hazardous materials from the NPL facility. (ATSDR, 2009). The removal boundaries are carefully define security signs and permit displays ar e erected for the public to recognize that the environment is being targeted for asbestos removal. This protects the community during the process since they would not enter the dangerous boundary zones. It is hit illumination. Besides the electrical equipment are removed and all appliances which are utilise to provide electrical power must be turned off.These come to the asbestos risk when elimination and removal are done. It cannot be overemphasized that this realises complete elimination and security aft(prenominal) the process is completed. Hence, here is the justification that this is the best pick for removing both friable and non friable asbestos. It is highly recommended as a risk management device. How will elimination and removal provide a great amount of protection from the inherent risks associated with Asbestos? Obviously, it is irradiation of the risk itself.It is like conducting a root cause analysis whereby the foundation of the factor is upturned to ensure th at is has been destroyed completely. Isolation/enclosure/sealing engineering controls safe work practices (administrative controls) personal protective equipment (PPE) (Asbestos control measures, 2010) are all palliative measures. These do not stand the test of time because they act simply as control measures. There is still asbestos in the atmosphere. Of major significance is that the personal effects of asbestos do not manifest immediately.It takes years. During that time no one knows how effective these control measure might be. There is never a sure way of evaluating their true effectiveness until an entire community becomes ill from this delineation which was supposed to be controlled. Therefore, it is the authors belief that the best shipway to avoid any predisposed effects and provide optimum safety is by elimination and removal. An Outline of the selected method used to evaluate results of the option chosen to implement Asbestos risk management.The implementation task in i tself offers a process of evaluation which is to determine the presence of asbestos in the air after the elimination process has been completed. This is a scientific evaluation. There are in the main three types of asbestos. Prior to the elimination procedure the environmentalist would have evaluated the types to determine whether it was white (chsorile) blue (crocidolite) or brown (amosite). The Environmental Protective fashion (EPA) has devised a scientific methodology to evaluate asbestos removal.It has been researched and found to be an appropriate measuring instrument. This entails the adoption of an alternative test which will evaluate the removal procedure used to determine how effective it was in estimating how much asbestos was really removed. Precisely, it attempts to remove some types of asbestos harbored in buildings. The interior of the building is wet, and then pulverize without excluding whatever other types of asbestos may be present. Enough water is utilize to t rap any asbestos which might have escaped the initial reatment.This suffice is monitored and the amount of asbestos present in the atmosphere is evaluated. It is usually tested against a previously conducted irradiation treatment. (U. S Environmental Protection Agency. Asbestos Project Plan, 2010) This is a feasible way of evaluating the results of a previously conducted asbestos removal exercise. The environmentalists can too re-measure the asbestos content scientifically. However, this method even evaluates the specific instrument used and just not the degree of substances removed.