Socio-economic Influences on Health

Socio- economic Influences on wellnessScenarioYou atomic number 18 employed by the Public Health England as an assistant to the regional Public wellness officer in UK. Your manager has asked you to produce a report on why the tone forethought of individuals in the Midlands is lower than the capital of the United Kingdom. Your report should cover AC 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 (Evidence type-Report)AC 1.1 Explain the effects of socio-economic influences on wellness. Your report should highlight the reasons for the difference in keep foresight for the two regions M1.The term socio-economic has been developed from the sociology and economic disciplines which, respectively, research and examine people which comprise society and the economy which encapsulates finance. Together, social and economic accompanimentors, their interaction is examined to identify its impact and/influence on outcomes such(prenominal) as wellness. Socio-economic factors include income/low or no income, employment/ unemployment, the environment, entree to information, and citizenship status.The availability of jobs, and the type of jobs, is, in the main, the factor which impacts on life expectancy. Income is derived from employment, whether self or external, and with income hovictimization burn either be purchased or rented, fare endure be bought and citizenship issues great deal be resolved albeit cross counselings a begin such as the lumber of food and housing stock. However, it is quite a lot the case that without income acquiring food, clothing and shelter is problematic. Over many an(prenominal) historic period the main industries, which allowed families to manage their lives, have been either cut down or eliminated across the UK, and more(prenominal) so in some areas than in separates. In the Midlands many of the textile industries no gigantic-range exist, as too the car manufacturing industries, and cultivation in new technologies, available in other areas of the UK such as London, has either non been made available or is available in specific areas as opposed to all areas. Hence, without investment in other technologies by both the private and public sector jobs in areas such as the Midlands are limited educated Midlands people whose voice whitethorn have been heard in demanding make better civic services, such as in regular weekly bin collection, are no longer heard as many migrate to London for employment, and/or better employment opportunities.High socio-economic factors almost guarantees good health in that the superior of food is most in all probability to be wholesome and with ready get to to health information, whether in text or through networking such as having a neighbour who is a doctor or a aesculapian researcher, high socio-economic individuals will manage and monitor their health with regular visualize to alternative practitioners and gyms as they practise a preventative health life-style to avoid negative socio-economi c health conditions. Obviously, some health conditions can non be prevented if they are hereditary but, conditions cogitate to obesity for example, are more likely to be avoided with the assistance of a sensual fitness trainer for example. In so doing, obesity is avoided and linked lifestyle conditions such as Type 2 diabetes and hypertension can either be avoided or delayed. This whitethorn not be the case with those living with low incomes, either owing to gravely paid employment positions or unemployment. Such people would not be able to afford a personal trainer who may also assist them in constructing a menu conducive to a brawny lifestyle notably not all vegetables are of the same nutritious quality so even if low income families are eating healthily they may not be eating quality health food when compared with those with a high income (Fowajuh, 2007 Joseph Rowntree nucleotide, 2011). Based on available employment opportunities, it would be safe to claim that high income individuals/families are more likely to be found in London than in the Midlands, with the ceremonial occasion that life expectancy being greater in London than in the Midlands.Along with the quality of food purchased, and opportunities to purchase help to support a healthy physical regime, is the issue of housing. Low income individuals may have to content themselves with having a pileus over their heads, irrespective of damp which brings on mould, poor heating and a generally unpleasant environment. Conditions, as stated in previous sentence, impacts on respiratory health, and if a tiddler grows up in such conditions, these conditions can either exacerbate asthma or increase the chances of developing it, with long-run effects into adulthood and quite limiting life expectancy. A child from a high income family may have asthma but the chances of his or her home environment aggravating the condition is quite minimal, if at all. In addition, those with high disposable incomes are more likely to live in hospital organized religion areas which are well resourced and well-funded, and if not they are more likely to make a fuss to try and force a change or have the know how to demand a irregular opinion or go to the private sector Low income individuals are unlikely to do the same and most certainly will not have the finance to go privateQuite, unfortunately, socio-economic factors, which are greatly modify by income leave certain regions in the UK at the mercy of those dispensing healthcare, whether it is adapted and fit for purpose or not, hence the discrepancy in life expectancy in regions such as London and the Midlands. In essence, the primordial socio-economic factor, Money buys goods and services that improve health. The property families have, the better the goods and services they can buy. and For various reasons, people on low incomes are more likely to adopt unhealthy behaviours smoking and drinking, for example succession those on high incom es are more able to afford healthier lifestyles (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2014).AC 1.2 task the relevance of government sources in report on inequalities in health in EnglandThere are many various government sources reporting on the levels of health experienced by public service exploiters across England. These sources include Health Survey for England (HSFE), Acheson Report Independent Inquiry in Inequalities in Health (1998), Census Data and Health and Lifestyle Surveys (HALS). These sources, with the ejection of the Census Data, provide a snapshot of health of public health service users in England. The information acquired from these different sources assist the government in its decision devising when allocating health related funding to the various regions in England, recognising that the variation in health needfully, or to be precise health inequalities, within one particular region may be as great, or greater than, the variation in needs between regions.In a blog, on the Guardian website in 2010, the following statement part explains the relevance of government sources in reporting on inequalities in health in England in that It has been said that each stop on the regularise line to east London cuts life expectancy by a year (Guardian, 2010). The District line runs through some of the most overpriced areas in London through to some of the most disadvantaged. Drawing on statistics produced by the Office of National Statistics (ONS), this same blog highlighted the following the medium life expectancy age of a man in London is 78.6 however along the District Line, from west to east, the following boroughs showed variants around this ordinary age, as followsEaling 78.9Hammersmith Fulham 78.1Kensington Chelsea 84.4Westminster 83.4Tower Hamlets 76.0Newham 76.2Barking and Dagenham 76.5(Guardian, 2010).In an NHS study on life expectancy it was observed that Money may not buy you happiness, but it is linked to good health (NHS, 2015). Notably, this report considered the North-South divide in England, but this observation is very much applicable to the findings included in the Guardian blog above. Either side of the two richest boroughs in England, Kensington Chelsea and Westminster, the link between money and health, in London, is clear. At the west end of the District line masculine life expectancy differs from the London average by tenths of a share purpose Ealing being six tenths of a percentage point higher, while Hammersmith and Fulham is five tenths of a percentage point lower. Overall family income levels are not as high in these two boroughs when compared with Kensington Chelsea and Westminster, however, family income levels are higher than those in Tower Hamlets, Newham and Barking Dagenham which have all been classed, at various times, as deprived boroughs (Hill, 2015).Although, the examples of life expectancy above are for men in London, the point should not be missed that money, or to be precise the lo se of money, does play a part in health inequalities. Thus, it is undoubtedly infallible for the government to be fully conversant with the varying conditions of wealth, which impact health outcomes, across England. In this way, funding and resources should be deployed to areas experiencing inequalities in health, and in so doing health inequalities should be address for the benefit of the population most in need of public funded health care.AC 1.3 Discuss reasons for barriers to admission chargeing healthcare.There are many reasons why there are barriers to accessing healthcare. These reasons include a deficiency of education, information, funding for staff and facilities and mobility, plus limited or no access to GPs and other health professionals.In detail, there is a somewhat convolve cycle of lack which may results in those with the most health needs not receiving the necessary medical attention. A lack of education may prevent a potential public service user from accessing and/or receiving the relevant information even if it is available, which may assist them in making an informed decision as to which health professional could be seen first. In England, now, a pharmacist could be the first point of call, avoiding possible long waits to see a GP. Therefore, simple and treatable conditions could get worst while awaiting a GP appointment.Without the appropriate information a public service user may not know that a certain question should be asked it is difficult to ask a question if one is ignorant of the fact that a question should be asked. Lack of information, along with restricted poesy in staffing contributes to ignorance in health related conditions, since the staff which could possibly excuse the outcomes, arising from no written information by sharing that information in discussion, may have been cut owing to limited and/or reduced funding. patronage, or the lack of it, reduces staffing levels and the appropriate facilities to address public health issues. Funding also impacts on GP availability if a health trust decides to cut funding per patient to a GP in this way GPs may be reluctant to accept new patients, or reduce surgery cover which may impact on the services provided by other health professionals linked to a surgery. Without a nearby and brotherly surgery, those service users with mobility issues may find it a struggle to attend the nighest surgery which requires a journey involving two or more changes using public transport.Whatever the reason, or combination of reasons, for being unable to access healthcare, most negative outcomes are probably quite preventable, and as such more costly to the public health providers when corrective action essential be taken.REFERENCESFowajuh, G. (2007) West Midlands Key Health Data 2007/08 Chapter Ten Inequalities in Life Expectancies in the West Midlands Available online athttp//medweb4.bham.ac.uk/websites/key_health_data/2007/ch_10.htmaccessed on 27/02/17Hill, D. (2015 ) Londons Poorest Boroughs Once Again Prepare to Make the Biggest Cuts Available online athttps//www.theguardian.com/uk-news/davehillblog/2015/feb/23/londons-poorest-boroughs-once-again-prepare-to-make-the-biggest-cuts accessed 27/02/2017Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2011) Does Income Inequality Cause Health and amicable Problems? Available online at https//www.jrf.org.uk/report/does-income-inequality-cause-health-and-social-problems accessed on 27/02/17Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2014) How does Money Influence Health? Available online at https//www.jrf.org.uk/report/how-does-money-influence-health accessed on 27/02/17NHS (2015) Study Finds North-South Divide in UK Life presentiment Available online at http//www.nhs.uk/news/2015/09September/Pages/Study-finds-North-South-divide-in-UK-life-expectancy.aspx accessed on 27/02/17